I guess that would require at least some spatial adjustment as any two pairs of points on two images might not have exactly the same spacing.Īs one might guess, I've never done this, but look forward to trying it in the future.Warning: This feature is very experimental. I thought that the software decided on a boundary common to two images and joined the pixel arrays together. That will just depend on how smart your software is at each step of the way.OK, I wasn't aware that any perspective adjustments were made by stitcher software. I would think that if you go the route of adjusting the perspective before going to your software, then you should tell your panorama software not to try and make its own adjustments. Hugin does a good job on its own at doing that for me. I generally do not adjust individual pieces of a panorama for perspective. Is it taking into account metadata and lens so that an image with a specific lens is adjusted the same way? The question with regard to using auto perspective is how is the software doing it. That will just depend on how smart your software is at each step of the way.
Presumably the perspective-corrected images could be cropped rectangular and then combined as a panorama I was wondering whether keystone like images would work in panorama software (and in particular Linux compatible panorama software).The question with regard to using auto perspective is how is the software doing it. I won't answer for others, but my original question was about using auto perspective on individual sub-panorama shots (thereby leading to a set with the keystone result), and then combining these in a panorama.
0 kommentar(er)
